blog
blog > Man lets former partner withdraw CA$5m jackpot, she elopes with her lover
Man lets former partner withdraw CA$5m jackpot, she elopes with her lover
blog xn--casin-di-sanremo-sub.xyz Aug 15, 2025 0
Man lets former partner withdraw CA$5m jackpot, she elopes with her lover
🎰 Background: CA$5 Million Lottery Dispute Plaintiff: Lawrence Campbell, of Winnipeg, Manitoba Defendant: Krystal McKay, his ex-girlfriend Other defendants: Western Canada Lottery Corporation (WCLC) and Manitoba Liquor & Lotteries 💸 Key Events Timeline January 20, 2024: Campbell wins the CA$5 million jackpot. Problem: Campbell lacks a government-issued ID and bank account, required to claim the [...]

🎰 Background: CA$5 Million Lottery Dispute

  • Plaintiff: Lawrence Campbell, of Winnipeg, Manitoba

  • Defendant: Krystal McKay, his ex-girlfriend

  • Other defendants: Western Canada Lottery Corporation (WCLC) and Manitoba Liquor & Lotteries


💸 Key Events Timeline

  • January 20, 2024: Campbell wins the CA$5 million jackpot.

  • Problem: Campbell lacks a government-issued ID and bank account, required to claim the prize.

  • Alleged Advice: WCLC reportedly advises Campbell to let someone else claim the ticket on his behalf.

  • Campbell’s Decision: He entrusts the ticket to McKay, his then-girlfriend.

  • January 30, 2024: McKay publicly claims the prize.

    • Lottery states she received the ticket as a birthday gift – a claim Campbell now disputes.

  • Soon After: McKay cuts off contact with Campbell — reportedly “ghosting” him — and he finds her with a new partner.


⚖️ Lawsuit Details

  • Filed: May 23, 2025

  • Campbell’s Claims:

    • He was misled by the lottery agencies.

    • He never gifted the ticket — it was always his, and McKay only claimed it on his behalf.

    • McKay abused his trust and misappropriated the winnings.

  • Legal Goals:

    • Full restitution of the CA$5 million

    • Injunction to prevent McKay from spending any of the funds

  • McKay’s Actions:

    • Filed a restraining order against Campbell, suggesting the situation may have escalated personally.


🧠 The Legal and Emotional Complexity

  • The case hinges on:

    • Who truly owned the ticket — was it a gift or a delegated claim?

    • Whether the lottery corporation’s advice caused the mishandling of ownership.

    • Verbal agreements vs. legal documentation — which party can prove intent and ownership.

  • Campbell’s legal rep, Chad Panting, admits the story may sound bizarre:

    “Some of this sounds incredulous, but it’s the truth all the same.”


📌 What’s Next

  • If Campbell proves he was the true owner and McKay was merely acting as a proxy, he could be entitled to the entire $5 million.

  • The court will also examine WCLC’s role and whether their alleged advice opens them to liability.

  • If McKay can prove the ticket was a true gift, the money is legally hers.


🧾 Takeaway

This isn’t just a case about lottery winnings — it’s a cautionary tale about trust, legal documentation, and financial boundaries in relationships. If nothing else, it highlights the importance of formalizing large transactions — even (and especially) with people you love.

xn--casin-di-sanremo-sub.xyz
No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *